<Статус Факультативного протокола к Конвенции о правах ребенка, касающегося торговли детьми, детской проституции и детской порнографии (Нью-Йорк, 25 мая 2000 года)» [рус., англ.] (по состоянию на 16.09.2010)

ion and Child Pornography.
This objection shall not preclude the entry into force of the Convention between Qatar and Sweden. The Convention enters into force in its entirety between the two States, without Qatar benefiting from its reservation."
11 July 2003
With regard to the declaration made by Turkey upon ratification:
"The Government of Sweden has examined the declaration made by Turkey upon ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.
The declaration states that Turkey will implement the provisions of the Optional Protocol only to the States Parties which it recognises and with which it has diplomatic relations. This statement in fact amounts, in the view of the Government of Sweden, to a reservation. The reservation makes it unclear to what extent Turkey considers itself bound by the obligations of the Optional Protocol. In absence of further clarification, therefore, the reservation raises doubt as to the commitment of Turkey to the object and purpose of the Optional Protocol.
The Government of Sweden would like to recall that, according to customary international law as codified in the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties, a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of a treaty shall not be permitted. It is in the common interest of States that treaties to which they have chosen to become parties are respected as to their object and purpose, by all parties, and that States are prepared to undertake any legislative changes necessary to comply with their obligations under the treaties.
The Government of Sweden therefore objects to the aforesaid reservation made by Turkey to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.
This objection does not preclude the entry into force of the Optional Protocol between Turkey and Sweden. The Optional Protocol enters into force in its entirety between the two States, without Turkey benefiting from its reservation."

End Note
1. For the Kingdom of Belgium.
2. In its instrument of ratification, the Government of China informed the Secretary-General of the following:
In accordance with the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and as suggested by the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the application of the Protocol to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China requires prior enactment of domestic legislation by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and the Protocol shall not apply to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China until the Government of China notifies otherwise;
2. In accordance with the Basic Law of the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and as suggested by the Government of the Macao Special Administrative Region, the Protocol shall apply to the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.
3. With a territorial exclusion in respect of the Faroe Islands and Greenland.
4. See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
5. For the Kingdom in Europe. On 17 October 2006: extension to Aruba.
6. See also note 1 under "New Zealand" regarding Tokelau in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
7. With regard to the reservation made by Qatar upon accession, the Secretary-General received the following communication on the date indicated hereinafter:
Ireland (6 January 2003):
"The Government of Ireland have examined the reservation to the Optional Protocol

> 1 2 3 ... 15 16 17 18