<Статус Конвенции Организации Объединенных Наций против коррупции (Нью-Йорк, 31 октября 2003 года)» [рус., англ.] (по состоянию на 16.09.2010)

een withdrawn. The withdrawal was effected on 9 September 2009. The text of the reservation that was withdrawn reads as follows:
"In accordance with Article 66 (3) of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the Republic of Kenya declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 2 of Article 66 of the Convention, which deals with the settlement of disputes arising between States Parties concerning the application of the Convention and referral to the International Court of Justice, because Kenya believes that such disputes should be resolved through amicable negotiation or mediation or conciliation between the parties."
5. See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
6. In a communication received on 4 November 2008, the Government of Mozambique informed the Secretary-General of the following:
"The Republic of Mozambique does not consider itself bound by the provision of Article 66, paragraph 2 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, which provides that any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention that cannot be settled through negotiation shall, at the request of one of those States Parties, be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice.
The Republic of Mozambique considers that no dispute of such nature may be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice without the consent of all parties to the dispute."
Within a period of one year from the date of the depositary notification transmitting the reservation (C.N.834.2008.TREATIES-32 of 5 November 2008), none of the Contracting Parties to the said Convention had notified the Secretary-General of an objection either to the deposit itself or to the procedure envisaged. Consequently, the reservation in question was accepted for deposit upon the above-stipulated one year period, that is on 4 November 2009.
7. For the Kingdom in Europe.
8. On 12 October 2006, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland informed the Secretary-General of the following:
"...the said Convention shall extend to the British Virgin Islands being a territory for whose international relations the Government of the United Kingdom is responsible.
The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland considers the extension of the United Nations Convention against Corruption to the British Virgin Islands to take effect from the date of deposit of this notification...".
Furthermore, on 9 November 2009, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland informed the Secretary-General of the following:
"...the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland wishes the United Kingdom's Ratification of the Convention to be extended to the following territories for whose international relations the United Kingdom is responsible:
Bailiwick of Guernsey
Bailiwick of Jersey
Isle of Man
The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland considers the extension of the aforesaid Convention to take effect from the date of deposit of this notification..."
9. Upon ratification, the Government of France made the following notification under article 46 (13):
The Central Authority referred to in article 46 (13) of the Convention for the French Republic is the Ministry of Justice, Direction des affaires criminelles et des graces, Bureau de l'entraide penale internationale, 13, Place Vendome, 75042 Paris CEDEX 01.
This notification was replaced by a subsequent notification received by the Secretary-General on 27 October 2009.

> 1 2 3 ... 36 37 38