Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 18.02.2010 «Дело Алиева (Aliyeva) против России» [англ.]

night of 29 October 2002 she had heard noise and had gone out to the stairway enclosure. There she had seen somebody breaking down the door between the lobby and the staircase. She had said not to break down the door as she would open it herself. However, unknown persons had broken down the door and entered. They were armed men in masks with automatic guns. One of them had said to her in Russian "Stand back!" and had closed the door to her apartment. She had heard them breaking down the door of the Aliyevs' apartment. When she looked out into the street she saw a man in camouflage uniform with an automatic weapon sitting there. Then she opened the door again and saw an armed man in a mask who noticed her and turned towards her. She got frightened and closed the door. Then she heard the noise in the stairway enclosure and went to the kitchen window to see what was going on in the yard. There she saw a group of approximately ten men in camouflage uniforms walking fast towards Bogdana Khmelnitskogo Street. Two of them were carrying Mr Abu Aliyev. There was nobody else in the street. She left her apartment and went to see the applicant to find out what had happened. The applicant told her that those men had been looking for her husband. They had tied her up but had not touched the children.
17. On 13 January 2003 the Grozny Prosecutor's Office informed the applicant that the investigation into her husband's kidnapping had been stayed for a failure to identify those responsible.
18. On 17 and 23 January 2003 the Grozny Prosecutor's Office informed the Special Envoy of the Russian President in Chechnya for Rights and Freedoms and the applicant that an investigation in case No. 48193 had been instituted on 11 November 2002.
19. On 9 March 2003 the Grozny Prosecutor's Office informed the applicant that the investigation in case No. 48193 had been stayed for a failure to identify those responsible and that investigative measures were being taken to resolve the crime.
20. On 23 June 2003 the applicant was again questioned. According to the Government, she submitted no new information.
21. On 27 August 2003 the investigating authorities sent instructions to district prosecutors in the Chechen Republic to intensify search measures.
22. On 7 October 2003 the applicant asked the Grozny Prosecutor's Office to clarify what stage the investigation into her husband's kidnapping had reached. She further requested that, if the proceedings had been stayed, the decision to suspend the investigation be quashed.
23. On 8 October 2003 Ms Sh., the applicant's neighbour, was questioned. According to the Government, she stated that on the night of the abduction she had been woken up by the noise. However, she had noticed nothing else and had fallen asleep again. The next morning she had learned that Mr Abu Aliyev had been abducted.
24. On 9 October 2003 Mr B., another neighbour of the applicant, was questioned. According to the Government, he submitted that he was living with his ex-wife in the apartment next to the Aliyevs. On 29 October 2002 she had been woken up by loud noise in the stairway enclosure. He had thought that it was thieves, but his wife had said that it was servicemen. She had asked him not to go out and had gone to the window herself. They had heard noise from apartment No. 77 but had not been able to understand what was going on there. In about ten minutes everything had calmed down and they had gone to apartment No. 77 to find out what had happened. There in the kitchen he had seen the applicant who had said that the armed men in camouflage uniforms had taken away her husband. His wife had confirmed that she had seen armed men in camouflage uniforms.
25. On 10 October 2003 the Leninskiy District Prosecutor's Office informed the applicant that the decision to suspend the investigation in case No. 48193

> 1 2 3 4 ... 15 16 17