Главная страницаZaki.ru законы и право Поиск законов поиск по сайту Каталог документов каталог документов Добавить в избранное добавить сайт Zaki.ru в избранное




Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 29.10.2009 «Дело Хантиева и другие (Khantiyeva and others) против России» [англ.]





wn prosecutor's office (the town prosecutor's office) instituted an investigation into the abduction of Mayrudin Khantiyev under Article 126 § 1 of the Criminal Code (kidnapping). The case file was given the number 12368. The decision stated that, having examined the materials of the inquiry opened following the third applicant's complaint, the town prosecutor's office had established that on 4 December 2000 at about 6.10 a.m. unidentified persons in masks and camouflage uniforms had abducted Mayrudin Khantiyev from his flat and taken him to an unknown destination.
24. On 4 January 2001 the town prosecutor's office forwarded the first applicant's request for assistance in the search for her son to the ROVD for examination.
25. On 18 January 2001 the town prosecutor's office issued the applicants with a statement concerning the investigation into the abduction of Mayrudin Khantiyev. The document stated that on an unspecified date they had suspended the investigation in the criminal case for failure to establish the identity of the perpetrators.
26. On 20 January 2001 the town prosecutor's office granted the third applicant victim status in criminal case No. 12368.
27. On 9 February 2001 the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic (the republican prosecutor's office) forwarded the applicants' complaint about the abduction of Mayrudin Khantiyev to the town prosecutor's office for examination and instructed the latter to consider whether an investigation into that incident should be opened.
28. On 1 April 2001 the republican prosecutor's office forwarded the first applicant's complaint about her son's abduction by armed masked men in camouflage uniforms to the town prosecutor's office for examination.
29. On 27 July 2001 the town prosecutor's office replied to the third applicant's query and informed her that the investigation in criminal case No. 12368 was under way.
30. On 31 July 2001 the town prosecutor's office replied to the first applicant that they had examined her complaint about her son's abduction and that criminal case No. 12368 had been forwarded to the republican prosecutor's office for examination.
31. On 7 August 2001 the republican prosecutor's office informed the first applicant that they had examined the investigation file in criminal case No. 12368 and had issued unspecified instructions aimed at identifying the perpetrators.
32. On 8 August 2001 the republican prosecutor's office forwarded the first applicant's request for assistance in the search for her son to the town prosecutor's office.
33. On 21 August 2001 the Prosecutor General's office of the Russian Federation informed the first applicant that her complaint about her son's abduction had been forwarded to the republican prosecutor's office.
34. On 25 August 2001 the town prosecutor's office granted the first applicant victim status in connection with the proceedings in case No. 12368.
35. On 9 September 2001 the republican prosecutor's office forwarded the first applicant's request for assistance in the search for her son to the town prosecutor's office.
36. It appears that on 12 or 18 September 2001 the town prosecutor's office suspended the investigation in criminal case No. 12368 for failure to establish the perpetrators. There is no indication that applicants were informed about that decision.
37. On an unspecified date in September 2001 the first applicant wrote to the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation. She complained about her son's abduction by armed men in camouflage uniforms who had arrived on the white VAZ-2121 car. In her letter she pointed out that at the time of the abduction a number of Russian military servicemen had



> 1 ... 2 3 4 5 ... 22 23 24

Поделиться:

Опубликовать в своем блоге livejournal.com
0.2322 СЃ