Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 23.04.2009 «Дело Алаудинова (Alaudinova) против России» [англ.]

hat the district prosecutor's office had been investigating criminal case No. 61033 and the investigation had not confirmed the theory of the involvement of the Russian military servicemen in the abduction of Bekkhan Alaudinov.
35. On 11 April 2003 the district prosecutor's office granted the applicant victim status in criminal case No. 25157.
36. On 21 April 2003 the applicant wrote to a number of State authorities, including the Prosecutor General. In her letter she described the circumstances of her son's abduction, complained that her requests to the State authorities had not produced any results and requested assistance in the search for Bekkhan Alaudinov.
37. On 1 August 2003 the applicant wrote to the Chechnya prosecutor. In her letter she stated that the State authorities had denied their involvement in the abduction of her son and that the investigation had failed to examine the evidence demonstrating that Bekkhan Alaudinov had been abducted by representatives of the Russian military forces. The applicant stated that her son's abductors had been under the command of the district military commander General G.; that one of the perpetrators had been seen in the building of the district military commander's office and the vehicles which had taken away her son had been provided with an unobstructed passage through the Russian military checkpoints. Referring to the European Convention on Human Rights and the Russian Criminal Procedure Code the applicant requested that the prosecutor undertake the following measures: resume the investigation in criminal case No. 25157; question the officers who had been on duty at the checkpoint between Urus-Martan and the village of Gekhi on the night of the abduction; question the officers who had been stationed in the building of the district military commander's office in November 2001; summon the officers who had been stationed at the district military commander's office at the material time to take part in an identification procedure so the applicant could identify those who had participated in the abduction of her son; and, finally, transfer the investigation to the military prosecutor's office if necessary.
38. On 22 August 2003 the Chechnya prosecutor's office informed the applicant that on the same date the prosecutor's office had resumed the investigation in criminal case No. 25157.
39. On 29 September 2003 the Chief Military Prosecutor's office forwarded the applicant's request to the military prosecutor's office of the UGA for examination.
40. On 22 October 2003 the Chechnya prosecutor's office forwarded additional information they had received from the applicant concerning the circumstances of her son's abduction to the district prosecutor's office for examination. The letter did not specify the nature of the additional information.
41. On 10 December 2003, in response to the applicant's complaint, the Chechnya military commander requested the district military commander's office to undertake measures to establish the whereabouts of Bekkhan Alaudinov.
42. On 9 April 2004 the applicant wrote to the district military commander requesting assistance in the search for her son. She pointed out that she had seen the officer who had participated in her son's abduction going into the district military commander's office and complained that her numerous letters to the State authorities had not produced any results.
43. On 28 June 2007 the applicant requested that the investigators allow her to familiarise herself with the case file in criminal case No. 25157, inform her about the status of the criminal investigation and undertake additional investigative measures. In her letter she provided a detailed account of the circumstances surrounding her son's abduction and expressed her opinion that the

> 1 ... 2 3 4 5 ... 16 17 18