Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 02.04.2009 «Дело Сайдалиева и другие (Saydaliyeva and others) против России» [англ.]

a Saydaliyev's kidnapping had been resumed.
36. On 1 August 2004 the district prosecutor's office informed the first applicant that the investigation had again been suspended but noted that investigative measures were being taken to find Vakha Saydaliyev.
37. On 2 August 2004 the district prosecutor's office issued the first applicant with a certificate confirming that the investigation into Vakha Saydaliyev's kidnapping was pending and that his whereabouts were unknown.
38. On 21 August 2004 the UGA prosecutor's office forwarded the first applicant's letter to the unit prosecutor's office and ordered an inquiry into the matters complained of.
39. On 25 December 2004 the UGA prosecutor's office informed the first applicant that an inquiry into her son's disappearance had established that servicemen of the law-enforcement agencies under their jurisdiction had not been implicated in the crime.
40. On 17 February 2005 the first applicant complained about her son's disappearance to the military commander's office of the Shali District ("the military commander's office"). On the same date the military commander's office replied that they had requested information on Vakha Saydaliyev's whereabouts from various official bodies.
41. On 10 March 2005 the unit prosecutor's office informed the first applicant that on 16 April 2002 the military personnel had not carried any special operations in the village of Serzhen-Yurt and had not apprehended any of its inhabitants.
42. On 12 March 2005 the military commander's office informed the first applicant that an operational and search case under the number 71026 had been initiated in respect of Vakha Saydaliyev's disappearance and was pending before the ROVD.
43. On 19 May 2005 the SRJI requested from the district prosecutor's office information on progress in the investigation in case No. 59186. On 6 June 2005 the district prosecutor's office replied that the case was pending before them and advised the SRJI to send further queries to the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic.
44. On 7 June 2005 the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic forwarded the first applicant's complaint to the district prosecutor's office and ordered that the investigation in case No. 59186 be pursued actively.
45. On 23 September 2005 the SRJI complained to the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic that they had been denied access to the investigation file in case No. 59186. They also requested to resume the investigation if it had been suspended.
46. On 11 October 2005 the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic informed the SRJI that, although Vakha Saydaliyev's kidnappers had not yet been identified, investigative measures were being taken to solve the crime. They also noted that the first applicant could receive copies of decisions on institution and suspension of the proceedings from the district prosecutor's office.
47. On 19 September 2007 the Shali Inter-District Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Prosecutor's Office informed the second applicant that the investigation in case No. 59186 had been resumed on 20 August 2007 and that investigative measures were being taken to solve the crime.
48. On 1 October 2007 the Ministry of the Interior of the Chechen Republic informed the first applicant that the investigation into her son's kidnapping was pending before the district prosecutor's office and that the ROVD were taking all requisite measures to find Vakha Saydaliyev and the perpetrators.

2. Information submitted by the Government

49. On 6 August 2002 the district prosecutor's office at the first applicant's request instituted an investigat

> 1 ... 2 3 4 5 ... 18 19 20