Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 15.01.2009 «Дело Абдурзакова и Абдурзаков (Abdurzakova and Abdurzakov) против России» [англ.]

and the Urus-Martan District Court ("the district court").
23. In the following months the applicants continued to search for their son and contacted various official bodies, such as the Special Envoy of the Russian President in Chechnya for Rights and Freedoms ("the Special Envoy"), the President of the Chechen Republic, the Russian Ministry of the Defence and the prosecutors' offices at different levels. In their applications they described in detail the circumstances of Vakha Abdurzakov's abduction and asked for assistance in establishing his fate and whereabouts. It appears that those applications were to no avail.
24. On 3 November 2002 the district prosecutor's office instituted an investigation into the disappearance of Vakha Abdurzakov under Article 126 § 2 of the Russian Criminal Code (aggravated kidnapping). The case file was given the number 61146.
25. On 29 November 2002 the district prosecutor's office granted the first applicant victim status in case No. 61146.
26. On 14 January 2003 the district prosecutor's office informed the first applicant that the investigation in case No. 61146 had been suspended for a failure to identify those responsible and that the ROVD had been instructed to search for Vakha Abdurzakov.
27. On 21 May 2003 the district prosecutor's office informed the Special Envoy's office that the investigation into Vakha Abdurzakov's kidnapping had been opened on 3 November 2002, that all requisite investigative measures had been taken and that the ROVD had been instructed to search actively for perpetrators.
28. On 16 March 2004 the first applicant requested the South Federal Circuit Department of the Prosecutor General's Office to help her to find her son. Her letter was then forwarded to the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic.
29. On 22 April 2004 the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic forwarded to the district office the first applicant's letter of 16 March 2004 and ordered that the search for Vakha Abdurzakov be actively pursued.
30. On 16 June 2004 the district prosecutor's office informed the first applicant that the investigation in case No. 61146 had been suspended and that investigative measures were being taken to solve the crime.
31. On 22 June 2004 the first applicant requested the district prosecutor's office to resume the investigation into her son's kidnapping, to take the requisite steps to solve the crime, to allow her access to the investigation file and, if necessary, to transfer the case to a military prosecutor's office.
32. On 1 July 2004 the district prosecutor's office replied that, despite the requisite investigative measures taken in case No. 61146, the perpetrators had not been identified. They further noted that other measures were being taken and that the investigation would be resumed once new information on the case was obtained.
33. On an unspecified date in August - September 2004 the investigation into Vakha Abdurzakov's kidnapping was resumed.
34. On 2 September 2004 the first applicant requested the district prosecutor's office to question Ms Yu. as a witness.
35. On 17 September 2004 the district prosecutor's office suspended the investigation in case No. 61146 for failure to identify those responsible and informed the first applicant accordingly on 20 September 2004.
36. On 11 October 2004 the district prosecutor's office granted the first applicant's request to question Ms Yu. On an unspecified date Ms Yu. submitted that Vakha Abdurzakov had been detained in the district military commander's office and that she had given the applicants' money to "Sergey" and "Volodya" as a payment for his release.
37. On 19 December 2005 the first applicant requested the district military comm

> 1 2 3 4 ... 18 19 20