case. The hearings were scheduled regularly, and the adjournments were short.
63. Having regard to the relative complexity of the case, significant delays attributable to the applicant and the authorities' expeditious treatment of the case, the Court is satisfied that the "reasonable time" requirement was not breached in the present case.
64. There has, accordingly, been no violation of Article 6 § 1 on this account.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Declares the complaint concerning the length of the proceedings admissible and the remainder of the application inadmissible;
2. Holds that there has been no violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 21 October 2010, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Christos ROZAKIS
President
{Andre} WAMPACH
Deputy Registrar
> 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7