Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 07.10.2010 «Дело Скачков (Skachkov) против России» [англ.]

¦ ¦ ¦ metres) ¦ ¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦From 25 March to 7 April 2002 ¦ 159¦ 55.4¦ 22¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦From 7 April 2002 to 11 February 2003 ¦ 153¦ 53.4¦ 22¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦From 11 February to 8 August 2003 ¦ 159¦ 55.4¦ 22¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦From 8 August to 5 September 2003 ¦ 151¦ 56.4¦ 22¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦5 September 2003 ¦ 299¦ 12.0¦ 4¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦From 5 September to 30 October 2003 ¦ 151¦ 56.4¦ 22¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦From 30 October to 26 December 2003 ¦ 153¦ 53.4¦ 22¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦From 26 December 2003 to 28 January 2005¦ 162¦ 58.6¦ 22¦
+----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+-----------+
¦From 28 January to 25 February 2005 ¦ 122¦ 55.1¦ 22¦
L----------------------------------------+--------+-----------+------------

19. The Government did not provide information concerning the number of inmates per cell for the periods from 25 March 2002 to 25 August 2004 and from 2 to 13 January 2005. As regards the period of the applicant's detention from 25 March 2002 to 26 December 2003, they referred to the destruction of the official relevant records due to the expiration of the statutory time-limit for their storage. They presented a copy of the list of the official records destroyed on 18 August 2006. The list included registers of incoming and outgoing correspondence, lists of the inmates discharged from the remand prison, personnel data, minutes of the remand prison administration's meetings, financial statements and registers of the inmates' complaints. The Government did not explain as to why the records concerning the applicant's detention from 26 December 2003 to 25 August 2004 and from 2 to 13 January 2005 were unavailable.
20. According to the excerpts from the remand prison population register concerning the applicant's detention from 25 August 2004 to 2 January 2005 and from 13 January to 25 February 2005 submitted by the Government the number of inmates detained in the same cells with the applicant varied from fifteen to twenty-two persons in cells Nos. 162 and 122 with the following exceptions: one day in November, eleven days in December 2004, five days in January and ten days in February 2005 the number of the inmates varied from twenty-three to twenty-seven.
21. The applicant was not confined to his cell for the whole of the day. He left the cell to meet with his lawyer, relatives and the prison administration. He was entitled to one hour's exercise in the prison courtyard and had the right to use the shower at least once a week for at least fifteen minutes.
22. All the cells in the remand prison were equipped with natural and piped ventilation which was in good working order. The average temperature in the cells was at least + 18 °C during the winter and did not exceed + 23 °C in the summer.
23. At all times the applicant was provided with an individual sleeping place, bedding and cutlery. The cells were disinfected regularly. The lavatory was located som



> 1 2 3 4 ... 9 10 11

	Поделиться:	Tweet