al request for his extradition was received.
10. The applicant registered his place of residence in Russia with the relevant authorities.
2. Extradition proceedings
11. On 28 November 2007 the applicant was arrested by servicemen of the Moscow Department of the Federal Security Service and police of the Odintsovo District.
12. In the morning of 30 November 2007 the applicant was questioned in the absence of a lawyer. The servicemen who carried out the interview threatened to use violence against the applicant and his family unless he voluntarily agreed to leave Russia for Tajikistan. According to the applicant, he was not informed of the reasons for his arrest in the course of the interview. Neither did he have access to a lawyer during the two following weeks in detention.
13. On 30 November 2007 the Odintsovo Town Court of the Moscow Region ("the Town Court") ordered the applicant's placement in custody pending his extradition. The term of detention was not specified.
14. Between 30 November 2007 and 30 January 2008 the applicant was kept in a temporary detention facility of the Odintsovo District Department of the Interior. In the meantime his wife was expelled to Tajikistan.
15. On 21 December 2007 the Prosecutor General of Tajikistan sent a request for the applicant's extradition to the Prosecutor General of Russia and enclosed a copy of the decision of 22 June 2000 to charge the applicant with membership of a proscribed organisation and copies of the search and arrest warrants.
16. On 4 June 2008 the Deputy Prosecutor General of Russia ordered the applicant's extradition to Tajikistan to face criminal prosecution. The order stated that the applicant had been charged with membership of a proscribed religious-extremist organisation and dissemination of material containing incitement to religious hatred.
17. The applicant challenged the extradition order of 4 June 2008 in court.
18. On 22 August 2008 the Moscow City Court upheld the order of 4 June 2008. It reasoned that there were no legal grounds impeding the applicant's extradition to Tajikistan because the applicant was a Tajik national and his request for political asylum had been rejected. The applicant's claims that he was not guilty of the crimes of which he had been charged had been examined and dismissed "on the ground that issues of falsification of charges in his respect by law-enforcement agencies of Tajikistan [were] not subject to examination in the course of [that] court hearing". It further stated that allegations of persecution on religious grounds had not been confirmed by reliable evidence, and concluded as follows:
"[Mr] Khodzhayev does not have refugee status in the Russian Federation, has not been and is not being persecuted on grounds of his race, religion, citizenship, nationality or association with a particular group [and] has not applied for Russian citizenship or political asylum."
19. On 28 October 2008 the Supreme Court of Russia examined an appeal by the applicant against the judgment of 22 August 2008 and dismissed it, reproducing the reasoning of the Moscow City Court verbatim.
3. Asylum proceedings
20. On 11 January 2008 the applicant lodged a request for political asylum with the Moscow Department of the Federal Migration Service ("the Moscow FMS").
21. On 11 January 2008 the applicant requested protection from the Russian Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ("the UNHCR Office"). It appears that UNHCR Office staff were not allowed to visit the applicant over the following months.
22. On 16 May 2008 the Moscow FMS refused to grant the applicant political asylum. On an unspecified date the applicant was notified of that decision.
23. The applicant challenged the Moscow FMS's de
> 1 2 3 ... 21 22 23