Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 01.04.2010 «Дело Гултяева (Gultyayeva) против России» [англ.]

ly document issued during the applicant's detention. It reflects the applicant's medical history in the IZ-62/1.
(a) General conditions
76. According to the applicant, between 29 March and early May 2000 she was held in cell No. 53, then she was transferred to cell No. 47 in which she spent three months, in early August 2000 she was placed in cell No. 020 where she remained until the middle of October 2000, then she spent a month and a half in cell No. 49, and from later November 2000 until 30 September 2002 she was kept in cell No. 54. The Government disputed this submission. One of the certificates of 21 August 2007 submitted by them states that from 29 March until 29 May 2000 the applicant was held in cell No. 49, from 29 May until 29 June 2000 she was kept in cell No. 020, and from this latter date until 30 September 2002 she was kept in cell No. 54.
77. In the applicant's submission, cell No. 53 measured approximately 24 square metres and was 3 metres high. It was designed for ten detainees. The applicant shared this cell with five inmates. Cell No. 47 also measured approximately 24 square metres and was designed for ten detainees. It held nine inmates. The applicant shared cell No. 020 measuring about 8 square metres and designed for four detainees with another cellmate. Cell No. 49 measured 20 square metres and was designed for ten inmates. It accommodated the applicant and one more detainee. The applicant shared cell No. 54 measuring 14 square metres with another detainee.
78. According to the Government, cell No. 49 measures between 24.6 square metres, as indicated in a certificate of 3 November 2004, and 26 square metres, as indicated in a certificate of 21 August 2007. The cell is intended for seven detainees, whereas the applicant shared this cell with five cellmates. Cell No. 020 measures 8 square metres and is designed for two detainees. In the Government's submission, the applicant was held there alone. Cell No. 54 measures between 14 square metres, according to a certificate of 3 November 2004, and 15.1 square metres, as stated in a certificate of 21 August 2007. The applicant shared this cell, which could accommodate up to four detainees, with another cellmate.
79. According to the applicant, in each cell where she was kept there was a single window. In cell No. 53 the window measuring approximately 1 x 1.4 metres was partly covered with glass and partly with plywood and always remained shut, therefore there was no natural ventilation. In cells Nos. 47, 020 and 49 the windows were not glazed, whereas in cell No. 54 the window, also measuring 1 x 1.4 metres, was only partly glazed. The applicant submitted in respect of her detention in cell No. 49 that the prison authorities had repeatedly refused to accept glass for the window from her husband and had not glazed the window before the middle of November 2000 following numerous complaints by the applicant to the regional prosecutor's office. In the applicant's submission, the windows in each cell were covered with metal grilles supplemented with "eyelashes", which are metal strips covering the grille. From the outside the windows were covered with wooden shields, and therefore only refracted daylight could reach inside. Each cell was only illuminated with a single 60-watt bulb.
80. The Government submitted that during the entire period of the applicant's detention the windows in all the cells had been glazed and had never been covered with plywood. The size of the windows - 1.4 x 1 metres in cells Nos. 49 and 54, and 0.8 x 0.8 metres in cell No. 020 - was sufficient to let in enough daylight to enable detainees to read. Each window had a vent which ensured proper natural ventilation of the cells. According to the Government, the shutters had been removed from the windows in the period from January to March 2003. As regards artificial light, the Government submitted tha

> 1 2 3 ... 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26

0.1439 с