Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 29.10.2009 «Дело Вахаева и другие (Vakhayeva and others) против России» [англ.]

considered.
46. On 12 March 2002 the investigation was resumed.
47. On 19 March 2002 the Urus-Martan District Prosecutor's Office issued the first applicant with a certificate stating that the criminal investigation into the disappearance of her son had been opened on 18 October 2000.
48. On 12 April 2002 the investigation was suspended on account of the failure to identify the perpetrators. The decision reiterated that the four detainees had been released on 14 August 2000.
49. On 14 June 2002 the first applicant wrote to the Human Rights Department of the Chechen Republic, requesting their assistance in establishing the whereabouts of Kazbek Vakhayev. On the same day she sent a similar request to the Deputy Prime Minister of the Government of the Chechen Republic.
50. On 19 March 2003 the first applicant wrote to the Urus-Martan District Prosecutor's Office, asking them to question Colonel Sh.
51. On 15 July 2003 the Urus-Martan District Prosecutor's Office lifted the adjournment of the criminal proceedings in case No. 24048 and resumed the investigation.
52. On 22 August 2003 the first applicant requested the Urus-Martan District Prosecutor to inform her of the measures taken further to her earlier applications.
53. On 8 September 2003 the Urus-Martan District Prosecutor's Office informed the applicant that Colonel Sh. had not been charged with the abduction of her son and that there had been insufficient evidence to bring charges in the case.
54. On 28 September 2003 the investigation was resumed.
55. On 28 October 2003 the Urus-Martan District Prosecutor's Office again adjourned the investigation on account of the failure to identify the perpetrators. The decision reiterated that the four detainees had been released on 14 August 2000.
56. On 15 December 2003 the first applicant requested the Urus-Martan district prosecutor to allow her access to criminal case file No. 24048.
57. On 19 December 2003 the acting Urus-Martan district prosecutor informed the applicant that access could not be granted as the case file had been sent to the Prosecutor's Office of the Chechen Republic.
58. On 27 January 2004 the first applicant wrote to the head of the Federal Security Service (FSB) of the Urus-Martan district, asking whether her son had been suspected of any illegal activities.
59. On 27 February 2004 the FSB of the Urus-Martan district replied to the first applicant that they had no information concerning Kazbek Vakhayev.
60. On 2 April 2004 the first applicant requested the Prosecutor's Office of the Chechen Republic to inform her which prosecutor's office was in charge of the investigation into case No. 24048 and asked them to inform her of the measures taken. On 19 April 2004 the applicant re-sent the same request to the Prosecutor's Office of the Chechen Republic and the Urus-Martan District Prosecutor's Office. On 18 May 2004, having received no reply, she repeated her enquiry.
61. On 21 May 2004 the first applicant requested the Urus-Martan District Prosecutor's Office to bring criminal charges against Colonel Sh., against the head of the detention facility of the Urus-Martan VOVD and against all the servicemen of that department involved in the arrest of Kazbek Vakhayev, his remanding in custody and, possibly, his murder. She further requested that the four unidentified bodies discovered on 22 August 2000 in Goy-Chu and re-buried in Goyskoye be exhumed. She also requested that she be allowed access to case file No. 24048 in order to take copies of it.
62. On 10 June 2004 the investigation was resumed.
63. On 15 June 2004 the acting prosecutor of the Urus-Martan district replied to the first applicant, informing her that the materials in the case file were insufficient to either establish th

> 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 ... 21 22 23

0.1366 с