Постановление Европейского суда по правам человека от 30.07.2009 «Дело Ламажик (Lamazhyk) против России» [англ.]

and stole property, thus causing the victims Mr O., Mr Or. and Mr D. pecuniary damage in the amount of 78,430 roubles, and fled the crime scene.
Having regard to the threat which the committed criminal offence poses to society and taking into account that [the applicant], if at liberty, may obstruct the establishment of the truth in the criminal case and may also abscond from the investigation and the court...

[I] ORDER:

1. That a measure of restraint in the form of arrest should be applied to [the applicant], who is to be informed of this, against his signature on a copy of the present decision..."
The decision bore the applicant's signature under the last printed paragraph, confirming that the decision had been served on him on 17 May 2000.
9. On 4 March 2000 the head of the investigative unit placed the applicant on the wanted persons list. The relevant part of the decision read:
"On 3 March 2000 a decision charging [the applicant] with having committed a crime proscribed by Article 162 § 3 (b) of the Russian Criminal Code and a warrant for his arrest were issued, given the particular gravity and dangerous nature of the crime committed by him. On the same day [police officers] were authorised to bring [the applicant] to the pre-trial investigating authorities for the reading out of the charges and his questioning as an accused. However, the accused, [the applicant], was not found at his place of residence... [It] was established that he left for the Barun-Khemchinskiy District in the Tyva Republic. His exact location was not discovered."
10. On 6 March 2000 the applicant was arrested. On the following day the Kyzyl District Prosecutor authorised his detention on remand.

B. Extensions of detention by prosecution authorities

11. On 9 June 2000 the acting Prosecutor of the Tyva Republic, by the same decision, extended the applicant's and his co-defendant's detention until 21 July 2000, relying on the particular gravity of the charges against them and the likelihood that they would pervert the course of justice and abscond if released.
12. The applicant's and his co-defendants' detention was further extended on 13 July, 10 and 23 October 2000 until 21 October and 6 November 2000 and 21 January 2001 respectively, with reference to the same grounds as in the decision of 9 June 2000.

C. Trial proceedings and further detention on remand

13. On 20 January 2001 the applicant was committed for trial before the Supreme Court of the Tyva Republic. According to the Government, the applicant's detention from 21 January to 20 March 2001 was not covered by any legal order as the domestic authorities were not required to issue one under the legislation governing criminal procedure.

D. First round of additional investigation

14. On 15 February 2001 the Supreme Court of the Tyva Republic adjourned the examination of the criminal case because one of the applicant's co-defendants had violated the conditions of his release on bail and had absconded. The case file was sent to the Prosecutor of the Tyva Republic. The Supreme Court also noted that the prosecution authorities were to "determine the issue of the application of a measure of restraint [in respect of the applicant and his co-defendants]".
15. The Supreme Court of the Tyva Republic resumed proceedings on 5 March 2001 and fixed a hearing for 12 March 2001. That hearing was adjourned because the victims and a lawyer failed to appear.

E. Second transfer of the case for additional investigation

16. On 20 March 2001 the Supreme Court of the Tyva Republic returned the case file to the prosecution authorities with an order to correct certain serious procedural defects, noting that the d

> 1 2 3 ... 16 17 18

0.139 с