91. On an unspecified date the investigators conducted identification procedures on the clothing found on the site of the discovery of the human remains in Goyty. The copy of this document, as submitted to the Court by the Government, is illegible.
92. On 27 October 2006 the investigators informed the applicant that they had suspended the investigation in the criminal case.
93. On 2 November 2006 the investigators informed the applicant that they had resumed the investigation in the criminal case.
94. Between 3 and 29 November 2006 the investigators questioned the following witnesses: Mrs L.I., Mr A.K., Mr S.U., Mrs T.M., Mrs A.M., Mrs L.N., Mr S.M., Mr R.S., Mr M.M., Mr Sh.Zh. and Mr M.N. According to the Government, their statements did not provide any significant information. The Government did not submit copies of any of these statements.
95. On 6 November 2006 the Operational Group of the Ministry of the Interior informed the investigators that their operational search measures had failed to establish Ibragim Uruskhanov's whereabouts.
96. On 10 November 2006 the investigators collected from the applicant's daughter a pair of black slippers and a piece of a black T-shirt for inclusion in the criminal case file.
97. On 16 November 2006 the Operational Search Bureau of the Ministry of the Interior in Grozny informed the investigators that they were taking operational search measures aimed at the identification of Ibragim Uruskhanov's abductors.
98. On 20 November 2006 the Chechnya FSB informed the investigators that they had no information concerning the perpetrators of Ibragim Uruskhanov's abduction.
99. On 24 November 2006 the investigators questioned the applicant's relative, Mr R.S., who stated that he had been in the Kalmyk Republic when he had been informed about Ibragim Uruskhanov's abduction on 12 April 2002. Around 24 April 2002 human remains had been discovered on the outskirts of a nearby village. The relatives had informed the witness that they had found Ibragim Uruskhanov's trousers and slippers on the site.
100. On 3 December 2006 the investigators informed the applicant that they had suspended the investigation in the criminal case.
101. On 12 February 2007 the applicant requested the district prosecutor's office to provide her with access to the investigation file and allow her to make copies of its contents.
102. On 11 February 2008 the investigators forwarded a number of information requests to various military and law enforcement bodies, including military unit No. 68797. The investigators requested to provide information as to which military units which had been stationed in Urus-Martan in the vicinity of the applicant's house from 11 to 20 April 2002. The Government did not provide a copy of either any of these requests or responses to them.
103. On the same date the investigators requested the VOVD to establish additional witnesses of the abduction, including those who could have seen the APCs.
104. Between 13 and 19 February 2008 the investigators questioned the following witnesses: Mr Kh.A., Mr Kh.G. and Mr I.B. According to the Government, their statements did not provide any significant information. The Government did not submit a copy of any of these statements.
105. On 14 February 2007 the investigators partially granted the applicant's request for access to the investigation file. The decision stated that the applicant was allowed to familiarise herself only with documents which reflected investigative measures taken with her participation. The applicant was informed about the decision on the same date.
106. On 8 February 2008 the investigators informed the applicant that on the same date they had resumed the investigation in the criminal case.
107. On 8 March 2008 the investigat
> 1 2 3 ... 10 11 12 ... 21 22 23
Zaki.ru законы и право
поиск по сайту
каталог документов
добавить сайт Zaki.ru в избранное
Правовые акты международные
Правовые акты Российской Федерации
