icant with a progress report on case No. 19109 which stated that the investigation had been opened on 18 July 2001 and that on 20 July 2001 the investigation file had been transferred to the unit prosecutor's office.
32. On 18 September 2003 the unit prosecutor's office informed the third applicant that the investigation file in case No. 14/33/0405-01 had been transferred to the circuit prosecutor's office on 13 August 2001.
33. On 10 November 2003 the second applicant requested the circuit prosecutor's office to update her on progress in the investigation in case No. 14/33/0405-01 and to send her a copy of the latest decision.
34. On 7 February 2004 the second applicant again wrote to the circuit prosecutor's office repeating her request of 10 November 2003.
35. On 5 March 2004 the circuit prosecutor's office forwarded the second applicant's complaint to the military prosecutor's office of the United Group Alignment ("the UGA prosecutor's office") and invited the second applicant to send any further queries to the UGA prosecutor's office or the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic.
36. On 8 March 2004 the UGA prosecutor's office forwarded the second applicant's letter to the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic and mentioned that the investigation file in case No. 34/33/0405-01 had been transferred to the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic on 19 February 2003. A copy of the letter was sent to the second applicant.
37. On 26 March 2004 the UGA prosecutor's office forwarded the fourth applicant's complaint to the unit prosecutor's office.
38. On 26 April 2004 the unit prosecutor's office informed the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic that an inquiry had not established that federal servicemen were implicated in the kidnapping of Aslan Dokayev and Rustam Achkhanov, and forwarded the results of the inquiry.
39. On 27 April 2004 the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic forwarded the second applicant's complaint to the district prosecutor's office.
40. On 1 June 2004 the second and fourth applicants requested the district prosecutor's office to inform them of progress in case No. 34/33/0405-01 and to grant them victim status.
41. On an unspecified date in June 2004 the first, second and fourth applicants visited the district prosecutor's office and were served with a copy of the decision to suspend the investigation of 18 June 2002.
42. On 7 July 2004 the unit prosecutor's office informed the fourth applicant that the investigation file in case No. 19109 had been forwarded to the circuit prosecutor's office.
43. In a letter of 7 September 2004 the unit prosecutor's office informed the Committee on the Constitutional Rights of Nationals of the Chechen Republic and the fourth applicant that the inquiry had established that federal servicemen had not been involved in the kidnapping of Aslan Dokayev and Rustam Achkhanov and that the file had been forwarded to the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic.
44. On 30 September 2004 the prosecutor's office of the Chechen Republic informed the second applicant that it had instructed the district prosecutor's office to reinvigorate the investigation, to take requisite measures to solve the crime and to examine the feasibility of the transfer of the file to a military prosecutor's office. The second applicant was invited to send further queries to the district prosecutor's office.
45. On 12 October 2004 the fourth applicant complained to the Main Military Prosecutor's Office of Russia that there had been no effective investigation into his son's disappearance.
46. On 29 October 2004 the second, third and fourth applicants requested
> 1 ... 2 3 4 5 ... 19 20 21
Zaki.ru законы и право
поиск по сайту
каталог документов
добавить сайт Zaki.ru в избранное
Правовые акты международные
Правовые акты Российской Федерации
