«Статус Конвенции о согласии на вступление в брак, брачном возрасте и регистрации браков (Нью-Йорк, 10 декабря 1962 года)» [рус., англ.] (по состоянию на 19.05.2009)

cations, accessions, etc., on behalf of China (note 1 under "China" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume).
3. On 10 June 1997, the Governments of China and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland notified the Secretary-General of the following:
China:
[Same notification as the one made under note 6 in chapter V.3.]
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland:
[Same notification as the one made under note 5 in chapter IV.1.]
In addition, the notification made by the Government of China contained the following declaration:
1. It is the understanding of the Government of the People's Republic of China that article 1 (2) of the [said Convention] does not require legislative provision to be made, where no such legislation already exists in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, for marriage to be contracted in the absence of one of the parties.
2. The signature by the Taiwan authorities of China on 4 April 1963 of the [said Convention] is illegal and null and void.
4. The former Yugoslavia had signed and ratified the Convention on 10 December 1962 and 19 June 1964, respectively. See also note 1 under "Bosnia and Herzegovina", "Croatia", "former Yugoslavia", "The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" and "Yugoslavia" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
5. Czechoslovakia had signed and ratified the Convention on 8 October 1963 and 5 March 1965, respectively. See also note 1 under "Czech Republic" and note 1 under "Slovakia" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
6. See note 1 under "Germany" regarding Berlin (West) in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
7. The German Democratic Republic had acceded to the Convention on 16 July 1974. See note 2 under "Germany" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
8. See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
9. The formality was effected by Democratic Yemen. See also note 1 under "Yemen" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
10. In this regard, the Secretary-General received the following communications on the dates indicated hereinafter:
Germany (17 December 1999):
"The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany notes that this constitutes a reservation of a general nature in respect of provisions of the Convention which may be contrary to the domestic law of Bangladesh. The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany is of the view that this general reservation raises doubts as to the full commitment of Bangladesh to the object and purpose of the Convention. In view of the fact that the Convention contains only ten short articles the reservation to one of its core principles seems particularly problematic. It is in the common interest of States that treaties to which they have chosen to become Parties are respected, as to their object and purpose, by all Parties and that States are prepared to undertake any legislative changes necessary to comply with their obligations under these treaties.
The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany therefore objects to this reservation made by the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. This objection does not preclude the entry into force of the Convention between the Federal Republic of Germany and the People's Republic of Bangladesh".
Netherlands (20 December 1999):
"The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands considers that such a reservation, which seeks to limit the responsibilities of the reserving State under the Convention by invoking national law, may raise doubts as to the commitment of this State



> 1 2 3 ... 6 7 8

	Поделиться:	Tweet