stigation was again suspended and the case was transmitted to the military prosecutor's office of military unit No. 20116.
48. On 23 June 2003, after the decision of 19 May 2003 was quashed, the case file was again received by the military prosecutor's office of military unit No. 20102.
49. On 27 June 2003 the Administration of Duba-Yurt issued the fifth applicant with a certificate stating that Mr Sayd-Salu Akhmatov had been apprehended on 9 June 2002 in the course of a special operation conducted in Duba-Yurt and had been taken away.
50. On 7 July 2003 the military prosecutor of the UGA informed the applicants that the criminal case was under the supervision of the Chief Military Prosecutor's Office and the military prosecutor's office of the UGA.
51. On 23 July 2003 the preliminary investigation was again suspended.
52. On 12 September 2003 the military prosecutor's office of the UGA transmitted the case to the military prosecutor's office of military unit No. 20102 and instructed it to resume the investigation.
53. On 25 September 2003 the military prosecutor's office of military unit No. 20102 quashed the decision to suspend the investigation of 23 July 2003 and resumed the investigation.
54. On 18 October 2003 the military prosecutor's office of military unit No. 20102 informed the applicants that it had requested the UGA to establish the whereabouts of the servicemen in question, belonging to battalion No. 348 of the Interior Ministry troops.
55. On 29 October 2003 the case file was received by the military prosecutor's office of the UGA.
56. On 13 November 2003 the military prosecutor's office of the UGA questioned Colonel D. ["Boomerang"], who stated that in June 2002 he had served as commander of "SSG-2", deployed at the northern boundary of the village of Stariye Atagi in the Grozny District. He had served as a commander from February 2002 to 10 January 2003. He had headed a special joint group of servicemen from different types of troops subordinate to the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Defence.
57. On 15 November 2003 the military prosecutor's office of the UGA informed the first, third, fifth and eighth applicants that investigative measures were being taken.
58. On 27 November 2003 the headquarters of the Interior Ministry troops informed the applicants that certain units of the troops had been involved in a special operation to disband an illegal armed group in the neighbourhood of Duba-Yurt, conducted on 9 June 2002. However, neither the Administration of Duba-Yurt nor the residents had had any complaints concerning the conduct of the operation. No unlawful acts had been committed by the troops, a fact which was confirmed by a statement issued by the Administration of Duba-Yurt. It was not possible to establish whether the APCs belonged to the Interior Ministry troops since the information submitted concerning their licence plates was incomplete. The servicemen referred to by the applicants had not served with the Interior Ministry troops.
59. On 31 December 2003 the military prosecutor's office of the UGA informed the third applicant that the Shalinskiy district prosecutor's office had instituted a criminal investigation into the facts set out in her application. The whereabouts of the servicemen referred to in the application had been established. The military prosecutors of the military units concerned had been instructed to question the witnesses.
60. On 15 January 2004 the military prosecutor's office of the UGA informed the third and fifth applicants that investigative measures were being taken and that the servicemen who had taken part in the special operation in Duba-Yurt, including captain L., had been identified and questioned in the course of the preliminary investigation.
61. On
> 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 ... 20 21 22