50-watt bulbs. On 17 April 2001 it had accommodated four inmates. The prison administration submitted a letter in which it certified that on 24 May 2001 there had been four inmates in the cell.
(ii) Conditions of detention in cells Nos. 102 and 84
37. The second applicant submitted that cells No. 102 and No. 84 measured 7.5 square metres, had four bunk beds and accommodated more than six detainees.
38. The Government submitted that cell No. 102 measured 9 square metres and had two sleeping places. Cell No. 84 measured 9.8 square metres and had two bunk beds. Both cells had natural and artificial ventilation and were lit by two 40-watt day lamps. On 16 December 2000 there had been two inmates in cell No. 102. The prison administration submitted a letter in which it certified that on 28 December 2000 there had been two inmates in cell No. 84.
(iii) Conditions of detention in the punishment cell
39. According to the second applicant, he had been detained for fourteen days in May 2001 in a punishment cell measuring approximately 4 square metres, with one bed and twelve detainees.
40. According to the Government, the cell No. 117 measured 8.2 square metres, had two sleeping places and, according to the prison administration, on 17 May 2001 had contained two inmates.
(a) General information on establishment IZ-69/1
41. The applicants submitted that they had taken walks in the detention centre courtyard every day. The walks had lasted between ten minutes and one hour depending on the guards' mood. The courtyard was exposed to the elements and had no roof, and in bad weather the walks usually lasted at least an hour.
42. The Government did not comment on these allegations.
43. According to the applicants, detainees could not take a shower more than twice or three times a month and the water in the shower was barely warm.
44. The Government submitted that the applicants had been allowed to take a shower once a week for at least fifteen minutes.
45. The applicants also submitted that all the cells they had described lacked proper ventilation systems and were very hot in summer and cold in winter.
46. According to the Government, all the cells referred to above had both artificial and natural ventilation systems. The windows in all of the applicants' cells were double glazed and had a window leaf for ventilation. Furthermore, the heating system in the prison was fully operational and the temperature in the cells was within the permissible range (+ 20 °C in winter and + 24 °C in summer).
47. According to the applicants, all the cells were infected with lice, fleas and bugs, none of the toilets in the cells offered detainees any privacy and the authorities had failed to provide them with fresh linen, blankets or crockery. They submitted three photographs of a cell in the detention centre in question. None of the beds in the photographs had any bed linen on them.
48. The Government submitted that both applicants had been provided with an individual sleeping place and had a mattress, a pillow with two pillowcases, two blankets, two sheets and three towels. In addition, they were given a mug, a spoon and a bowl. The bed linen was changed once a week after the inmates had taken a shower. There was a brick wall 1.20 metres high separating the toilet area from the living area in all the cells. The authorities submitted plans of the interior of all the cells and their dimensions. They further submitted that during the relevant period they had carried out disinfection works, including fumigating and disinfesting each cell twice a month.
49. The applicants alleged that the catering had been extremely poor.
50. The Government submitted that inmates were given food three times a day, in accordance with the relevant norms.
51. The applicants further submitted that
> 1 ... 2 3 4 5 ... 10 11 12
Zaki.ru законы и право
поиск по сайту
каталог документов
добавить сайт Zaki.ru в избранное
Правовые акты международные
Правовые акты Российской Федерации
