t was granted the status of a victim in the criminal proceedings. She was questioned on 5 August 2004.
46. On 5 August 2004 the investigator questioned A., the head of the Sunzhenskiy ROVD. On 7 August 2004 he questioned E., an officer of the Sunzhenskiy ROVD. On 9 August 2004 the investigator questioned Bad. and Kh., the heads of the Sunzhenskiy ROVD, and on 16 August 2004 he questioned A., an officer of the Sunzhenskiy ROVD.
47. On 17 August 2004 the investigator questioned as witnesses two police officers of the special police unit of the Ministry of the Interior of Ingushetia.
48. On 13 September 2004 the investigator questioned six officers of the traffic police of Ingushetia.
49. On the same date the prosecutor of military unit No. 04062 questioned the head of the Sunzhenskiy District Department of the FSB and on 18 October 2004 his deputy.
50. On 22 December 2004 the preliminary investigation was suspended on the ground that the person to be charged with the offence had not been identified.
51. On 1 April 2005 the deputy prosecutor of the Sunzhenskiy District quashed the decision to suspend the investigation.
52. On 5 April 2005 the investigation was resumed.
53. On 5 May 2005 the preliminary investigation was suspended again on the ground that the person to be charged with the offence had not been identified.
54. On 31 May 2005 the first deputy prosecutor of the Republic of Ingushetia quashed the decision to suspend the investigation and transmitted the case to the Prosecutor's Office of the Sunzhenskiy District for additional investigation.
55. On 1 June 2005 the investigator questioned as witnesses two neighbours of Mr Adam Medov.
56. On 1 July 2005 the investigator suspended the preliminary investigation again on the ground that the persons to be charged with the offence had not been identified.
57. On 3 October 2005 the first deputy prosecutor of the Republic of Ingushetia quashed the decision to suspend the investigation.
58. According to the Government, in the course of the investigation requests for information were sent to the Prosecutor's Office of the Chechen Republic, prosecutor's offices and investigating authorities of other Caucasian regions, the military prosecutor of UGA, the FSB Department for Northern Caucasia, the Ministry of the Interior of Ingushetia, medical institutions, a mobile network operator, airline and railway ticket offices, civil registrars, and passport and visa services. The investigating authorities also checked the registers of unidentified dead bodies and temporary detention facilities. According to the information received, the persons who presented themselves as FSB officers during the documents check had never served in the FSB and the documents presented had never been issued to them by the State authorities. Neither the Ministry of the Interior nor the FSB had conducted any operations in order to arrest Mr Medov and K. The Prosecutor's Office of the UGA had neither instituted proceedings against Mr Medov and K. nor arrested them.
59. On 15 April 2007 the investigation was suspended on the ground that the persons to be charged with the offence had not been identified. The applicant was notified accordingly.
60. On 20 November 2007 the investigation was resumed. The applicant was notified of the resumption.
3. Request for information
61. Despite specific requests made by the Court on several occasions, the Government did not submit any documents from the file in criminal case No. 04600045. Relying on the information obtained from the Prosecutor General's Office, the Government stated that the investigation was in progress and that disclosure of the documents would be in violation of Article 161 of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure, since the file contained infor
> 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 ... 18 19 20