<Статус Конвенции о борьбе против незаконного оборота наркотических средств и психотропных веществ (Вена, 20 декабря 1988 года)» [рус., англ.] (по состоянию на 16.09.2010)

legal basis for extradition of citizens to any country with which the United States has no bilateral extradition treaty in force.
"(3) Pursuant to the rights of the United States under article 7 of this treaty to deny requests which prejudice its essential interests, the United States shall deny a request for assistance when the designated authority, after consultation with all appropriate intelligence, anti-narcotic, and foreign policy agencies, has specific information that a senior government official who will have access to information to be provided under this treaty is engaged in or facilitates the production or distribution of illegal drugs."
Declaration:
"Pursuant to article 32 (4), the United States of America shall not be bound by article 32 (2)."

Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Interpretative declarations:
1. With respect to article 6: (Extradition)
It is the understanding of the Government of Venezuela that this Convention shall not be considered a legal basis for the extradition of Venezuelan citizens, as provided for in the national legislation in force.
2. With respect to article 11: (Controlled Delivery)
It is the understanding of the Government of Venezuela that publicly actionable offences in the national territory shall be prosecuted by the competent national police authorities and that the controlled delivery procedure shall be applied only in so far as it does not contravene national legislation in this matter.

Viet Nam <16>
Reservations:
"Reservations to article 6 on Extradition, article 32 paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 on Dispute settlement."

Yemen <10>
Upon signature:
[Yemen reserves its] right to enter reservations in respect of such articles as it may see fit at a time subsequent to this signature.

Objections (Unless otherwise indicated, the objections were received upon ratification, accession, acceptance, approval, formal confirmation or succession.)

Austria
16 December 1998
With regard to the reservation to article 6 made by Viet Nam upon accession:
"Austria is of the view that the reservation raises doubts as to its ratification of the mentioned treaty. Austria is of the view that the reservation raises doubts as to its compatibility with the object and purpose of the Convention concerned, in particular the fundamental principle that perpetrators of drug-related crime should be brought to justice, regardless of their whereabouts. Non-acceptance of this principle would undermine the effectiveness of the [said] Convention.
"Austria therefore objects to the reservation. This objection does not preclude the entry into force of the [said] Convention between Austria and Vietnam."

Belgium
27 December 1989
Belgium, member State of the European Community, attached to the principle of freedom of navigation, notably in the exclusive economic zone, considers that the declaration of Brazil concerning paragraph 11 of article 17, of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, adopted at Vienna on 20 December 1988, goes further than the rights accorded to coastal States by international law.

Denmark
27 December 1989
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Belgium.]

Finland
25 April 1997
With regard to the reservations made by Lebanon:
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by France.]

France
27 December 1989
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Belgium.]
7 March 1997
With regard to the reservations made by Lebanon upon accession:
The Government of France



> 1 2 3 ... 17 18 19 ... 25 26 27

	Поделиться:	Tweet