has taken note of the reservations [made] by the Government of Lebanon in respect of articles 5 and 7 of this Convention and considers these reservations to be contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention.
The Convention indicates that bank secrecy shall not be a ground for a failure to act or for a failure to render mutual assistance. The Government of France considers that these reservations therefore undermine the object and purpose of the Convention, as stated in article 2, paragraph 1, to promote cooperation in order to address more effectively the international dimension of illicit drugs trafficking.
16 December 1998
With regard to the reservation with regard to article 6 made by Viet Nam upon accession:
[The Government of France] considers [the reservation made by Viet Nam upon accession] to be contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention of 1988. France therefore objects to it.
The objection does not preclude the entry into force of the 1988 Convention between France and Viet Nam.
Germany <4>
27 December 1989
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Belgium.]
21 March 1997
With regard to the reservations made by Lebanon:
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by France.]
16 December 1998
With regard to the reservation to article 6 made by Viet Nam upon accession:
"The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany considers this reservation to be problematic in the light of the object and purpose of the Convention. The reservation made in respect of article 6 is contrary to the principle 'aut dedere au iudicare' which provides that offences are brought before the court or that extradition is granted to the requesting States.
"The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany is therefore of the opinion that the reservation jeopardizes the intention of the Convention, as stated in article 2 paragraph 1, to promote cooperation among the parties so that they may address more effectively the international dimension of illicit drug trafficking.
"The reservation may also raise doubts as to the commitment of the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam to comply with fundamental provisions of the Convention. It is in the common interest of states that international treaties which they have concluded are respected, as to their object and purpose, and that all parties are prepared to undertake any legislative and administrative changes necessary to comply with their obligations.
"The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany therefore objects to the reservation.
"This objection does not preclude the entry into force of the Convention between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam."
Greece
27 December 1989
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Belgium.]
Ireland
27 December 1989
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Belgium.]
Italy
27 December 1989
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Belgium.]
24 April 1997
With regard to the reservations made by Lebanon upon accession:
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by France.]
Luxembourg
27 December 1989
[Same objection, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Belgium.]
Mexico
10 July 1990
With regard to the interpretative declarations made by the United States of America:
The Government of the United Mexican States considers that the third declaration submitted by the Government of the United States of America (...) constitutes a unilateral claim to justification, not envisaged in the Convention, for denyin
> 1 2 3 ... 18 19 20 ... 25 26 27
Zaki.ru законы и право
поиск по сайту
каталог документов
добавить сайт Zaki.ru в избранное
Правовые акты международные
Правовые акты Российской Федерации
