<Статус Протокола о запрещении или ограничении применения мин, мин-ловушек и других устройств с поправками, внесенными 3 мая 1996 года (Протокол II с поправками, внесенными 3 мая 1996 года), прилагаемого к Конвенции о запрещении или ограничении применения конкретных видов обычного оружия, которые могут считаться наносящими чрезмерные повреждения или имеющими неизбирательное действие (Женева, 3 мая 1996 года)» [рус., англ.] (по состоянию на 16.09.2010)

9 years from the date on which the Amended Protocol II enters into force."

Belgium
Interpretative declarations:
Article 1:
It is the understanding of the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium that the provisions of Protocol II as amended which by their contents or nature may be applied also in peacetime, shall be observed at all times.
Article 2:
It is the understanding of the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium that the word 'primarily' is included in article 2, paragraph 3 of amended Protocol II to clarify that mines designed to be detonated by the presence, proximity or contact of a vehicle as opposed to a person, that are equipped with anti-handling devices, are not considered anti-personnel mines as a result of being so equipped.

Canada <1>
19 October 1998
Reservation:
"Canada reserves the right to transfer and use a small number of mines prohibited under this Protocol to be used exclusively for training and testing purposes. Canada will ensure that the number of such mines shall not exceed that absolutely necessary for such purposes."
Statements of Understanding:
"1. It is understood that the provisions of Amended Protocol II shall, as the context requires, be observed at all times.
2. It is understood that the word "primarily" is included in Article 2, paragraph 3 of Amended Protocol II to clarify that mines designed to be detonated by the presence, proximity or contact of a vehicle as opposed to a person, that are equipped with anti-handling devices, are not considered anti-personnel mines as a result of being so equipped.
3. It is understood that the maintenance of a minefield referred to in Article 10, in accordance with the standards on marking, monitoring and protection by fencing or other means set out in Amended Protocol II, would not be considered as a use of the mines contained therein."

China
Declaration:
I. According to the provisions contained in Technical Annex 2 (c) and 3 (c) of the Amended Protocol II, China will defer compliance with 2 (b), 3 (a) and 3 (b);
Declaration in respect of article 2 (3):
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Ireland.]

Denmark
Declarations:
[Same declarations, mutatis mutandis, as those made by Ireland.]

Finland
Declarations:
[Same declarations, mutatis mutandis, as those made by Ireland.]

France
Declarations concerning the scope of amended Protocol II:
[Same declarations, mutatis mutandis, as those made by Ireland in regard to article 1 and 2 of the Protocol.]
Article 4:
France takes it that article 4 and Technical Annex to amended Protocol II do not require the removal or replacement of mines that have already been laid.
Declaration concerning standards on marking, monitoring and protection:
The provisions of amended Protocol II such as those concerning the marking, monitoring and protection of zones which contain anti-personnel mines and are under the control of a party, are applicable to all zones containing mines, irrespective of the date on which those mines were laid.

Germany
Declarations in respect of articles 1 and 2:
[Same declarations, mutatis mutandis, as those made by Ireland.]
Declaration:
Article 5 paragraph 2 (b):
It is understood that article 5, paragraph 2 (b) does not preclude agreement among the states concerned, in connection with peace treaties or similar arrangements, to allocate responsibilities under paragraph 2 (b) in another manner which nevertheless respects the essential spirit and purpose of the article.

Greece
Declaration in respect of artic



> 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 ... 11 12 13

	Поделиться:	Tweet