«Статус Венской конвенции о праве международных договоров (Вена, 23 мая 1969 года)» [рус., англ.] (по состоянию на 19.05.2009)

¦24 Apr 1970¦ ¦
¦Uruguay ¦23 May 1969¦ 5 Mar 1982 ¦
¦Uzbekistan ¦ ¦12 Jul 1995 a ¦
¦Viet Nam ¦ ¦10 Oct 2001 a ¦
¦Zambia ¦23 May 1969¦ ¦
L---------------------------------------------+-----------+----------------

DECLARATIONS AND RESERVATIONS
(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and
reservations were made upon ratification,
accession or succession.)

Afghanistan
Upon signature:
"Afghanistan's understanding of article 62 (fundamental change of circumstances) is as follows:
"Sub-paragraph 2 (a) of this article does not cover unequal and illegal treaties, or any treaties which were contrary to the principle of self-determination. This view was also supported by the Expert Consultant in his statement of 11 May 1968 in the Committee of the Whole and on 14 May 1969 (doc. A/CONF.39/L.40) to the Conference."

Algeria
Declaration:
The accession of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria to the present Convention does not in any way mean recognition of Israel.
This accession shall not be interpreted as involving the establishment of relations of any kind whatever with Israel.
Reservation:
The Government of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria considers that the competence of the International Court of Justice cannot be exercised with respect to a dispute such as that envisaged in article 66 (a) at the request of one of the parties alone.
It declares that, in each case, the prior agreement of all the parties concerned is necessary for the dispute to be submitted to the said Court.

Argentina
(a) The Argentine Republic does not regard the rule contained in article 45 (b) as applicable to it inasmuch as the rule in question provides for the renunciation of rights in advance.
(b) The Argentine Republic does not accept the idea that a fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, may be invoked as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from the treaty; moreover, it objects to the reservations made by Afghanistan, Morocco and Syria with respect to article 62, paragraph 2 (a), and to any reservations to the same effect as those of the States referred to which may be made in the future with respect to article 62.
The application of this Convention to territories whose sovereignty is a subject of dispute between two or more States, whether or not they are parties to it, cannot be deemed to imply a modification, renunciation or abandonment of the position heretofore maintained by each of them.

Armenia <11>
13 July 2006
Reservation
"The Republic of Armenia does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and declares that for any dispute among the Contracting Parties concerning the application or the interpretation of any article of part V of the Convention to be submitted to the International Court of Justice for a decision or to the Conciliation Commission for consideration the consent of all the parties to the dispute is required in each separate case."

Belarus
[Same reservations and declaration, identical in essence, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by the Russian Federation.]

Belgium <12>
21 June 1993
Reservation:
The Belgian State will not be bound by articles 53 and 6

> 1 2 3 ... 6 7 8 ... 26 27 28

0.1414 с