eign nationals of the Moscow Main Directorate of Internal Affairs. The applicant appealed.
22. On 4 September 2007 the Court indicated to the respondent Government that the applicant should not be expelled to Uzbekistan until further notice.
23. On 11 September 2007 the Moscow City Court quashed the decision of the Meshchanskiy District Court and the applicant was released.
3. Further developments
24. On 28 September 2007 policemen stopped the applicant in the Moscow underground in order to check his papers. It appeared that the applicant was still on the cross-border wanted list, and he was taken to a police station for a decision concerning his arrest. After his counsel arrived and clarified the applicant's situation, he was released. The applicant then applied to the Office of the Prosecutor General to be removed from the list.
25. On 1 October 2007 the Russian Prosecutor General's Office ordered the Ministry of the Interior to remove the applicant's name from the cross-border wanted list owing to the refusal to extradite him.
4. Asylum proceedings
26. On 2 February 2007 the applicant applied to the Moscow Department of the Federal Migration Service for asylum.
27. On 16 March 2007 officials of the Moscow Department of the Federal Migration Service questioned the applicant in the presence of his counsel.
28. On 26 March 2007 the Moscow Department of the Federal Migration Service dismissed the applicant's application on the ground that he did not meet the requirements provided for in domestic law for granting asylum. The applicant lodged a complaint with a court.
29. On 23 August 2007 the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court of Moscow dismissed the applicant's complaint. The applicant appealed.
30. On 18 October 2007 the Moscow City Court dismissed the appeal in the final instance.
31. On 13 November 2007 the applicant was recognised as a mandate refugee by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
II. Relevant domestic law and practice
1. Constitution of the Russian Federation of 1993
32. Everyone has a right to liberty and security (Article 22 § 1). Arrest, placement in custody and custodial detention are permissible only on the basis of a court order. The term during which a person may be detained prior to obtaining such an order cannot exceed forty-eight hours (Article 22 § 2).
2. Code of Criminal Procedure
33. The term "court" is defined by the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) of 2002 as "any court of general jurisdiction which examines a criminal case on the merits and delivers decisions provided for by this Code" (Article 5 § 48). The term "judge" is defined by the CCP as "an official empowered to administer justice" (Article 5 § 54).
34. A district court has the power to examine all criminal cases except for those falling within the respective jurisdictions of a justice of the peace, a regional court or the Supreme Court of Russia (Article 31 § 2).
35. Chapter 13 of the CCP governs the application of preventive measures. Placement in custody is a preventive measure applied on the basis of a court decision to a person suspected of or charged with a crime punishable with at least two years' imprisonment where it is impossible to apply a more lenient preventive measure (Article 108 § 1). A request for placement in custody should be examined by a judge of a district court or a military court of a corresponding level (Article 108 § 4). A judge's decision on placement in custody may be challenged before an appeal court within three days (Article 108 § 11). The period of detention pending investigation of a crime cannot exceed two months (Article 109 § 1) but may be extended up to six months by a judge
> 1 2 3 ... 12 13 14 ... 18 19 20