asured around 56 sq. m and was equipped with forty-two bunk beds; the number of inmates kept there together with the applicant varied from twenty-five to sixty-six. Cell No. 51 measured 28 sq. m and had twenty-four bunk beds; it housed eight to twenty persons. Cell No. 8 measured 3 sq. m and was equipped with three bunk beds; one to three inmates were kept there.
46. The applicant was not provided with individual bedding. On several occasions he was not allocated an individual sleeping place and the inmates had to take it in turns to sleep.
47. In virtually every cell bunk beds were attached to the walls in three rows. In each cell there was a lavatory pan placed next to the dining table and bunk beds; lavatory pans were not cleaned properly and gave off an unpleasant odour.
48. The cells were not equipped with a ventilation system. As a result, in summer it was very hot and humid inside, while in winter it was very cold. The cells were poorly lit. However, a light was switched on day and night. There were cockroaches, bugs, mice and rats in the cells.
49. The inmates were not provided with toilet paper, toothpaste or cleaning products for sinks and lavatory pans. The applicant was only allowed to have a shower once a week.
50. There were no taps with running hot water in the cells. The remand prison administration provided the inmates with one bucket of hot water per cell twice a day. The inmates were not provided with drinking water and were obliged to drink tap water. The quality of food served in the remand prison was poor.
51. The inmates were escorted for a walk in a special area covered with an iron roof. The walks only lasted about half an hour, although they should have been at least one-hour long.
52. The applicant's counsel pointed out in his applications for release lodged with district and regional courts that the applicant was being kept in poor conditions. His assertions remained unanswered.
2. The Government's account
53. Between 13 April and 25 May 2004, as well as between 4 and 18 June 2004 the applicant was kept in cell No. 17 measuring 33.4 sq. m. The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from six to ten.
54. Between 18 June and 2 August 2004 the applicant was kept in cell No. 43 measuring 16.58 sq. m. The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from six to eight.
55. Between 2 August and 30 September 2004, as well as between 20 January and 28 March 2005 the applicant was kept in cell No. 56 measuring 58.03 sq. m. The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from twenty-nine to forty-two.
56. Between 30 September and 24 November 2004 the applicant was kept in cell No. 51 measuring 32.48 sq. m. The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from sixteen to twenty-three.
57. Between 14 and 20 January 2005 the applicant was kept in cell No. 8 measuring 12.97 sq. m. The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from one to three.
58. Between 28 March and 4 April 2005 the applicant was kept in cell No. 50 measuring 47.35 sq. m. The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from twenty-four to thirty-three.
59. Between 4 April and 15 December 2005 the applicant was kept in cell No. 19 measuring 23.6 sq. m. The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from five to twelve.
60. Between 14 and 27 June 2006 the applicant was kept in cell No. 12 measuring 54.6 sq. m. The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from twelve to eighteen.
61. The applicant was at all times provided with an individual bunk bed and bedding. The bunk beds were not attached to the walls in three rows.
62. T
> 1 2 3 ... 21 22 23 ... 33 34 35
Zaki.ru законы и право
поиск по сайту
каталог документов
добавить сайт Zaki.ru в избранное
Правовые акты международные
Правовые акты Российской Федерации
