:
i) 15000 евро (пятнадцать тысяч евро) заявителю в качестве компенсации морального вреда, а также любые налоги, начисляемые на указанную сумму;
ii) 3500 евро (три тысячи пятьсот евро) в качестве компенсации судебных расходов и издержек, с тем чтобы компенсация была выплачена представителям заявителя, а также любые налоги, обязанность уплаты которых может быть возложена на заявителя в связи с этой суммой;
b) что с даты истечения указанного трехмесячного срока и до момента выплаты на эти суммы должны начисляться простые проценты, размер которых определяется предельной кредитной ставкой Европейского центрального банка, действующей в период неуплаты, плюс три процента;
7) отклонил оставшуюся часть требований заявителя о справедливой компенсации.
Совершено на английском языке, уведомление о Постановлении направлено в письменном виде 26 ноября 2009 г. в соответствии с пунктами 2 и 3 правила 77 Регламента Суда.
Председатель Палаты Суда
Христос РОЗАКИС
Секретарь Секции Суда
Серен НИЛЬСЕН
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
FIRST SECTION
CASE OF NAZAROV v. RUSSIA
(Application No. 13591/05)
JUDGMENT <*>
(Strasbourg, 26.XI.2009)
--------------------------------
<*> This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Nazarov v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Christos Rozakis, President,
Anatoly Kovler,
Elisabeth Steiner,
Dean Spielmann,
Sverre Erik Jebens,
Giorgio Malinverni,
George Nicolaou, judges,
and {Soren} Nielsen, Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 5 November 2009,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in an application (No. 13591/05) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by a Tajikistani national, Mr Rakhmatullo Ismatulloyevich Nazarov ("the applicant"), on 8 April 2005.
2. The applicant was represented by Mr M. Ovchinnikov, a lawyer practising in Vladimir. The Russian Government ("the Government") were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.
3. On 26 May 2008 the President of the First Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3).
4. The Government objected to the joint examination of the admissibility and merits of the application. Having considered the Government's objection, the Court dismissed it.
THE FACTS
I. The circumstances of the case
5. The applicant was born in 1980 and lives in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. He is currently detained in remand prison IZ-33/1 in Vladimir.
A. The applicant's placement in custody and detention
6. At the material time the applicant was pursuing postgraduate studies in Vladimir, Russia.
7. On 4 April 2004 an investigator of the Department of Interior of the Vladimir Region instituted criminal proceedings against the applicant under Article 228 § 4 of the Russian Criminal Code (purchase or possession of drugs in large quantities). On the same day the applicant was arrested.
8. On 6 April 2004
> 1 2 3 ... 18 19 20 ... 33 34 35